Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 5
- Last 30 days
- 5
Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Oct 26, 2026.
Public comments (5)
A design review board member speaking for herself, she said even discounted fees are outrageously expensive — her own Mills Act application would cost about $30,000 — and the city needs to clarify 'like for like' standards.
City Council (Special) - Oct 26, 2026 · 23:15 →He said the program isn't working — commission meetings are canceled for lack of cases, the one application was deemed incomplete, and fees remain too high even with discounts; he suggested an informal interim process or greater city subsidy.
City Council (Special) - Oct 26, 2026 · 26:00 →Speaking for the Alhambra Preservation Group, he compared Alhambra's $3,000 evaluation fee to Pasadena's $124 and South Pasadena's $700, calling the fees outrageous for a city with an $88,000 median income and urging a re-evaluation.
City Council (Special) - Oct 26, 2026 · 30:48 →A longtime preservation advocate joining by Zoom, she recommended a further short-term fee cut paired with free public workshops run with the Historical Society and Preservation Group, noting zero completed applications in a year.
City Council (Special) - Oct 26, 2026 · 36:04 →The first Historic Preservation Commission president said she and her husband abandoned their own designation plans over $5,000-$10,000 in fees, and offered concrete fixes: fee waivers for early applicants, sliding scales, assessment mini-grants, workshops, and Mills Act fee rebates.
City Council (Special) - Oct 26, 2026 · 39:58 →